"1. Not enough methodological detail or clarity provided
2. No clear focused, specific, research questions/goals articulated3. Literature review doesn’t set up the questions/hypotheses4. Problems with spelling, grammar, writing, English, and APA style5. No policy/educational/practice implications given6. Conclusions don’t follow from the data (could have made the points in the discussion without doing the study)7. Contribution to the literature unclear8. Bad fit between research goals and method/design/analysis9. Poor fit between content of paper and scope of journal10. Poor data analyses or design" (Winsler, 2013)
March 14, 2013
Tips on publishing from ECRQ editor
Today the School of Teacher Education research committee invited Professor Adam Winsler, editor of Early Childhood Research Quarterly to present a workshop titled: "Publishing and reviewing
in top-flight peer-reviewed journals: A
mentoring workshop for early-career (and seasoned researchers)". The workshop was attended by students and academics who learned a lot of information and strategies for publishing in high quality journals. Here are Adam's top 10 tips for why quantitative and qualitative papers don't get published in ECRQ (and other journals):
Labels:
Collaborative Research Network,
journal,
journals,
research,
visitors