August 21, 2012

Parents’ perspectives on the professional-child relationship and children’s functional communication

The following paper has been accepted for publication, based on Karla Washington's postdoctoral research conducted in Canada (I was one of her supervisors).

UPDATED REFERENCE (OCTOBER, 2012)
Washington, K. N., Thomas-Stonell, N., McLeod, S., & Warr-Leeper, G. (2012). Parents’ perspectives on the professional-child relationship and children’s functional communication following speech-language intervention. Canadian Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology / Revue canadienne d'orthophonie et d'audiologie, 36(3), 220-233.


Abstract
Background. Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) use family-centred practices to implement intervention. Thus, consideration of family-based outcomes is encouraged. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health – Children and Youth version (ICF-CY) framework supports SLPs consideration of these outcomes (e.g., parental-perspectives on children’s Activities and Participation and Environmental Factors associated with speech-language intervention).
Purpose. To explore parents’ perspectives about: (a) the child-SLP relationship (Environmental Factors) and (b) children’s functional communication (Activities and Participation)
Method. Sixty-seven parents of preschoolers with communication disorders participated in this study. All 67 parents completed pre-intervention and post-intervention structured interviews about their children’s functional communication. Parents of preschoolers who received intervention (n=52) provided ratings and comments regarding the child-SLP relationship established during intervention with the clinician (n=7). Themes were identified using content analysis. Fifteen children were waitlist controls and did not receive intervention.
Results. Parents of preschoolers who received intervention reported significantly greater gains in children’s functional communication compared to those who did not. Most parents (94%) provided positive/very-positive perspectives about the child-SLP relationship. The child-SLP rapport and the SLPs’ professional competence were common themes identified in parents’ perspectives.
Conclusion: (a) Significant gains in preschool children’s functional communication occurred following speech and language intervention, and (b) factors such as the rapport established between the child and the SLP as well as the SLPs’ professionalism were considered by parents to be important factors for creating a positive child-SLP relationship during speech and language intervention.